Dawkins’ “Punctuation as a Rhetorical Tool” Translated into a Children’s
Book and a Guideline for College Applicants on how to Punctuate College Essays
For Writing Project 3, I will be translating and
transforming Dawkins’ piece on “Teaching Punctuation as a Rhetorical tool” into
a children’s book and a guideline for prospective college students and how they
should be structuring their college applicant essays, particularly regarding
the use of punctuation. The childrens’ book, the instructional guide, and the
original piece by Dawkins will all have some similarities in form and language,
but will have more differences. Their main similarity, however, will be the
author’s intention, which is to educate their audiences—regardless of whether
or not that audience may be much younger, slightly older, or academic—about the
rules, options, and rhetorical effects of using different types of punctuation
in writing.
In his article, Dawkins begins by introducing the issue
of the lack of specific rules with certain types of punctuation: no real rules
exist, but there are general practices that are used that have specific
effects, and commas, semi-colons, etc. all have their own uses and effects.
Next, Dawkins discusses sentences and independent clauses and what they are in
the language.
He provides different
tables for these which include: 1) a hierarchy of functional marks, 2) the
basic functions of those marks, 3) the patterns for those marks, and 4) the
rules for those patterns. Next, Dawkins discusses cases involving multiple
independent clauses, which concern degrees for separation between clauses
(maximum, medium, minimum). Then he goes into “pedagogy,” or the ways in which the
subject is taught.
The children’s book will be a very condensed, simplified
form of Dawkins’ article. There should not be more than a few sentences per
page, and there should not be many pages overall. The book will have to be
interactive in some sort of way, in order to draw in and interest the young
readers. I am thinking about putting in pictures, but this might not be
necessary. Right now, I’m imagining a pamphlet-sort of book with super-sized
font on each page that introduces the topic and asks questions for the reader
fairly frequently. The biggest issue will be the simplification of the
material. Regarding the complexity of the material, it will be very important
to provide a somewhat surface-level description of the ideas I will be sharing.
The ideas will have to be explained and understood very simply. I think a good
way to go about this would be to make the young readers think and have a sparked interest in the material—it will need to
be interesting. I don’t think that pictures will be absolutely necessary for
this, because I am not sure if they will just distract the reader. If I do
provide pictures, they will need to represent and support the content well.
They may just provide visual representations of the reasoning behind using
different techniques for punctuation, such as the different sorts and levels of
emphasis created when using a comma, semi-colon, hyphen, period, etc.
The form of an instructional guide for
prospective-college students writing college applications will have many
differences than the childrens’ book of course. For starters, the instructional
guide does not need to be as interesting. The guide will need to be succinct
however, and the different content within will need to be easily accessible to
the reader, for the reader to be able to access quickly while writing or
planning the essay, for example. The guide won’t be there to educate a writing
student, in the case of Dawkins piece, but it will be used as a functional
guide; therefore, the guide will be much more succinct than Dawkins’ piece,
which serves as more of a dissertation.
The children’s book, the instructional guide, and
Dawkins’ piece will all be similar in that they will intend to educate their audiences. The children’s
book and the instructional guide will be significantly shorter than Dawkins’
piece, but for different reasons and different effects: the childrens’ book
will be shorter because it will have very basic, surface-level information,
that will hopefully spark interest in the reader; the instructional guide will
be shorter because it will need to be succinct and to-the-point, to serve a
functional purpose of guiding the readers—college applicants—through how to use
the different types of punctuation in an essay, and the effects those choices
will have on their specific audience.
Ben,
ReplyDeleteIt seems like you’ve identified two “younger transformations”—not 1 younger and 1 older. (College applicants are younger than you.)
Regarding your children’s book idea, I told this to Yamada, who is also using this Dawkins piece: “An initial question I have is: who needs to learn this “rhetorical punctuation” stuff? A lot of folks, probably, but… TODDLERS? 3 year olds?! (Even 8 yr-old kids seems like a stretch….) While I do like the idea of making a nursery rhyme for learning purposes, I don’t know if the age is appropriate in this case. Again, ask yourself: who would benefit from learning this, and why?” Children’s books are more likely tailored to older kids than nursery rhymes, but to pull this off, I think you’d have to do some light background research about finding out at what SPECIFIC AGE/GRADE kids start to learn the virtues of punctuation. Then, maybe, this could be appropriate.
You could the instructional guide too, but some questions I have are: what reason do you have for thinking that these students don’t already know this? Also, if your goal is to really teach these youngins about rhetorical punctuation and have them LEARN, is an “instructional guide” the best way to do that? Seems like it might be a bit outdated and not so interesting/interactive.
Either way, you need to choose an “older transformation” based on your goals. Think about the big, great, wide world of genres that are out there, floating around—what 2 embody what you want to bring out of this scholarly piece?
Z
Hey Ben,
ReplyDeleteSick choice of your scholarly article!
I was a little confused on whether you chose to target and transform your scholarly article towards two younger audiences?
I like your specificity of how you will be writing your children’s book though, and think it is really creative how you are incorporating an interactive aspect to it. If you are involving interaction, I don’t think pictures will be necessary? Also, what age group was your children’s book targeting? Because the age of the audience is very dependent on what you include and how you present the information.
Additionally on your guide for college students for writing college applications, is punctuation really a valued and important aspect to an application? Because these college kids applying for college, should already know the basics on punctuations and how to use them.
Goodluck!
Hey,
ReplyDeleteDespite the fact that young kids might not need this information, like zack said, I think it'd be a great transformation! Who cares if they don't know what rhetoric they're sure as hell about to learn. Being a music guy, do you think you could use the rhyme or rhythm of the nursery rhyme to your advantage to convey a message to your audience? You were very specific with how the children's book will be written and I think that's awesome and it will really help you out in your transformation. Also, the summary you wrote about the article was terrific and it made me way more prepared to analyze, think and examine the rest of your PB. With college apps, do you think there is an even older audience based pieced you could transform this to? Maybe an online lecture or discussion? Maybe even an online conference or an in person conference which you could write a handbook for. Whatever you choose, have fun with it and keep the audience in mind!!!