Online Class Journal Q’s

I am happy with my specificity concerning WP2.  I started looking and writing specifically about what was asked for the prompt, and my ideas are more succinct than in the last WP. Part of the reason why I am a lot more succinct on my second WP is that I pre-wrote effectively. On my first WP, I tried attacking it using primarily first order thinking, with little review and self-criticism during the writing, and even the review, process. This time around, my structuring of my argument used a combination of first and second order ways of writing. I began with an outline this time, but this was just to provide a skeletal idea of how I was going to organize my paper; I did not even look at any articles yet. After reading the prompt, I created an outline that would deliver a better, more convincing argument--it even helped me zone in on the moves I would use myself.

I would like to know how my methods of argument were delivered in this WP, meaning how were they received by the reader?